The Network for Integrated Behavioural Science  
University of Nottingham
  • Print
multi-coloured cards with the word 'lying' on them

Deception and Reciprocity started life as an SSRN working paper published on 9 Jun 2016.  It has now been published online in Experimental Economics

Abstract: We experimentally investigate the relationship between (un)kind actions and subsequent deception in a two-player, two-stage game. The first stage involves a dictator game. In the second-stage, the recipient in the dictator game has the opportunity to lie to her counterpart. We study how the fairness of dictator-game outcomes affects subsequent lying decisions where lying hurts one’s counterpart. In doing so, we examine whether the moral cost of lying varies when retaliating against unkind actions is financially beneficial for the self (selfish lies), as opposed to being costly (spiteful lies). We find evidence that individuals engage in deception to reciprocate unkind behavior: The smaller the payoff received in the first stage, the higher the lying rate. Intention-based reciprocity largely drives behavior, as individuals use deception to punish unkind behavior and truth-telling to reward kind behavior. For selfish lies, individuals have a moral cost of lying. However, for spiteful lies, we find no evidence for such costs. Taken together, our data show a moral cost of lying that is not fixed but instead context-dependent.

Keywords: Deception; Lying costs; Reciprocity; Punishment; Laboratory Experiment

Authors: Despoina Alempaki University of Warwick, Gönül Doğan University of Cologne, Silvia Saccardo Carnegie Mellon University.



Posted on Monday 3rd December 2018

NIBS - Network for Integrated Behavioural Science

Sir Clive Granger Building
School of Economics
The University of Nottingham
University Park
Nottingham NG7 2RD

telephone: +44 (0)115 951 4763
fax: +44 (0)115 951 4159